Engrish Pictures and other Funny Engrish Mistakes in English from around the world.

 

« Previous | Next »


And your C++, .Net and HTML too



engrish funny basic belong

All your basic us belong to

Submitted by: dunno source via Engrish Funny Submissions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» Glory! 212 Comment

  1. Jason says:

    i dont know what to say>>>

  2. UpTheYingYang says:

    Good that means I can keep DOS.

  3. ... says:

    The prophecy spoke of this. When those who manage to screw up a meme about a bad translation with a bad translation the internet would go dark… Forever.

  4. Gone With The Wendell says:

    all my basicus belong to who?

  5. Starsky says:

    An Engrish translation of an Engrish translation. Wow… just wow…

  6. Bones says:

    All your base are belong to us XD

  7. Ian says:

    Whoa, how meta…

  8. tea says:

    HahaHA! I have upgraded from basic me! I am now strawberry flavored! Take that!

  9. Madsen says:

    Wow! As a person who started programming Mallard Basic on an Amstrad PCW8256 I need this shirt!

  10. Sui says:

    I wonder if they were trying to correct the original Engrish…

  11. JohnB says:

    It’s meta-Engrish! A sentence originally written in Engrish is mangled still further into Engrish squared! Tres cool!!

    • Droll not Troll says:

      Engrish squared: the answer is still 42. Which is odd, since Engrish = nowhere near 6.5 .

      • Doctor says:

        Well, you stumped me this time.

      • PoodleGroomer says:

        With Gaussian distribution the standard deviation allows a dual node square root of 6 and 9.

        • paws4thot says:

          Or we could muck around with number bases since 9*6 = 42 (in base 13).

          • Droll not Troll says:

            All your number bases belong us to!

            • JohnB says:

              So are you ever going to explain 42?

              • Droll not Troll says:

                The famous 42 meme? You must have been reading Kurt Vonnegut when I was reading Douglas Adams.
                In “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”, the ultimate computer is asked for the answer to the Ultimate Question: Life, the Universe and Everything. The answer it gives is 42, because the question was wrong.
                So 42 is a common answer to any quasi-mathematical question.

                • JohnB says:

                  Ah. Well, even if the question is wrong, I think the answer is yes.

                • PoodleGroomer says:

                  The computer that was supposed to find the answer to ultimate question in life ran for generations and declared that the answer was 42. They then find that they had lost the question and programming to find what the exact query was. They built a larger computer to reverse engineer the program (the Earth and its inhabitants) to find what the question was and the computer determined that it was “What is 6 * 9?”
                  I think that was one of the earliest casualties of first generation Pentium rounding error. They would have had the answer sooner if they knew how much load the screen saver was putting on the system.

    • H1N1 says:

      do you mean square root or cubic root? the square of an absurd number is sometimes a natural number like 2, whereas the square root of 2 is an absurd number, ca. 1.4142135…………….

  12. Alice says:

    MOVE ZIG!

  13. Cats says:

    For great justice!

  14. dr handle says:

    Take my Cobol. Please!

    • PoodleGroomer says:

      I’ll raise you RPG and an 80 column card punch.

      • Droll not Troll says:

        All your abacus are belong to us!

        • PoodleGroomer says:

          I still have an abacus and the instruction drill book. The drill book had 300 pages of tutorial and exercises. I also have several slide rules. I recently took a math course and the instructor and department head refused to acknowledge that they remembered any part of using them.

          • Droll not Troll says:

            You must have more than just a junkyard brain! I’m always being accused of keeping too much stuff, but I finally got rid of my slide rule when I realised I hadn’t used it for 20+ years.

            • dr handle says:

              My dad thought it was tres amusing to have a performing small daughter who could use a slide rule, pour a beer with no head and tie a hangman’s noose. I was a great hit at dinner parties.

              • paws4thot says:

                I’m sure you still are.

              • WorrierPrincess says:

                Suddenly I wish I had a child.

                • Yoda via Babelfish says:

                  Believe me, it’s a lot less trouble if you just borrow or rent one for dinner parties.

                  • dr handle says:

                    When I started kindergarten, I found that Mrs Richards the kindy teacher was not nearly as amused by my abilities as were my dad’s friends. At first I was deemed A Good Girl, who could help pour milk or fruit juice and carry a tray of full glasses without ever spilling any. Later, I was to learn that apparently, a slide rule is not suitable for show-and-tell. As for teaching other kids how to tie nooses with the skipping ropes, well, so what if we strung up one of the teddy bears? It was only a stuffed toy. How we laughed.

              • bluejade says:

                I like to do all those things, too… now I just go to engrish for fun… sniff

      • paws4thot says:

        Raise Fortran77, Coral66 and a paper tape reader.

        • PoodleGroomer says:

          Call and raise a BAUDOT Teletype with paper tap punch and 110 baud modem. I’m ready to go all in with an 80 column card sorter and 80 column card interpreter.

        • Mr. Frykas says:

          Call your Fortran77, Raise you an Altair 8800 with Teletype Board

          • paws4thot says:

            Raise a PDP-11, and a 12″ disc platter with a head crash on it, and see you both.

            • PoodleGroomer says:

              Call and raise an analog military fire (weapons) control computer. Don’t stand in front of the launch door.

              • Mr. Frykas says:

                Call the Teletype and Raise a Hellschreiber machine

                • JohnB says:

                  I call and raise The Football, complete, of course, with all the launch codes. Either I win this hand or the world becomes a radioactive wasteland.

                  • PoodleGroomer says:

                    I hold the fire control and launch system, but i’ll raise you FORTRAN IV and a 7 track mag tape drive.

                    • JohnB says:

                      Funny, I don’t feel raised.

                    • paws4thot says:

                      Ok, I’m going all in with a dual ICL 3980, a dual IBM 3090, a 6 node VAX cluster, a Sun Sparc network, a Prime 2250, several CP/M micros and Commodore PETs, COBOL, ALGOL, Turbo PASCAL 7.0, and a manual paper tape punch.

                      • Meowth says:

                        I raise you a Commodore 64 and throw in a Commodore 128.

                        • paws4thot says:

                          Ok, I’ll raise a VIC-1541. Geek points for anyone who knows what that is without a web search.

                        • Meowth says:

                          I’ll have to put in MS-DOS and Dr-DOS on a 386.

                        • paws4thot says:

                          Ok, an ICL One-per-Desk, and an Occam “Computing Surface”.

                          Incidentally, I really have used all of these I’ve listed except CORAL, which I’ve only had to read.

                        • Meowth says:

                          Well… I have SEEN what I’ve posted, and used some of them… I don’t recall ever using Dr-DOS, though. I only bought a Commodore 128 because I used to have a C64 and it does the emulation of a C64. I figured, “If I’m buying one on E-Bay, why not go with the 128? Sure, all my old Software is for the C64, but what if I ever got something that was for the 128?” Besides, it was only like $30.

                        • PoodleGroomer says:

                          How about my IBM digital submarine sonar system and a Tektronix 4051 with cartridge tape reader. I have worked on more things than I have listed.

                        • paws4thot says:

                          PG, I think we’d better stop this now; I think we’re heading suspiciously close to our real jobs!

                      • PoodleGroomer says:

                        How do you want to network this, Ethernet, token ring, or SDLC? Most of this was dead before a TCP/IP stack was ever written for them. I’ve had to use a paper tape patch several times.

                        • Meowth says:

                          Just get someone to write a TCP/IP stack for it. Someone wrote one for the C64 already, if I remember correctly.

                        • paws4thot says:

                          Ethernet will work, or we can write TCP/IP stacks for the kit that doesn’t already have support. Of course, we may have to clear out some of the older drivers on the smaller RAM systems.

        • Ch3dd4r says:

          I call and raise you all an indigo, an enigma, an abacus, HAL-9000, and Albert Einstein’s brain.

          Readitandweep, comrades.
          I dare you to top that.

  15. Rena says:

    YOU KNOWLEDGE DOING YOU WHAT

  16. Someone says:

    Someone set us up the bomb

  17. Cyus says:

    Don’t they mean “all your base are belong to us”? I thought that was Engrish. How could they mess that up?!

  18. T.R. says:

    Ha ha ha, oh wow.

  19. McBee says:

    Roses are #FF0000,
    violets are #0000FF,
    And all my bases belong to you…

  20. yokki says:

    if i knew it would be loved like this i would’ve bought the shirt xD now i feel sad leaving it after taking its photo

    • Droll not Troll says:

      Never let a chance go by. If I see a product with good Engrish on it, I’M BUYING IT!
      Apologies to anyone who now has a Bob Hudson earworm.

  21. Sinatra says:

    Dyslexia got?

  22. blah says:

    An engrish of engrish? I think they just created an engrish black hole.

  23. Moop says:

    It’s like an Engrish of the oh-so-famous Engrish, “All your base are belong to us”. I think my head just ‘sploded.

  24. Deacon Blues says:

    Main processor turn on! Code software for great justice!

  25. Andrea says:

    An Internet fad and Engrish mixed together.

    How unique. BTW, ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US.

  26. chimpsmirk says:

    a 3rd derivative at least

  27. Wölfbot 3000 says:

    I want this t-shirt so bad.

  28. Meowth says:

    Somebody up us sent bomb!

  29. Ichibod says:

    God, I really need one of these!

  30. Engrish Engrish?!! What is this world coming to?

  31. Zathael says:

    Meta-Engrish

  32. Dave says:

    The only way it could have been funnier was if it came out “We are in control of all your bases”, then Engrish would be a bijective isomorphic function, ha ha ha!

  33. Bob Bobberman says:

    huh, also, the letters “shadows” are all lower case, but the letters are upper case. this just fails on so many levels.

  34. Matt says:

    Engrish++, now with even more FAIL

  35. DrLex says:

    Maybe if this phrase goes through enough iterations of Engrishification, it will arrive at the correct translation of whatever “All your base are belong to us” was intended to be.

  36. vmp says:

    this t-shirt is amazing. i would definitely buy it.

  37. Totema says:

    WHAT YOU SAY!

  38. Meowth says:

    I fail to see how buying an Atari would help verify a line from a Sega Genesis game…

  39. PulpDood says:

    They Engrished something that was already engrish!!

    That heaps unpossibling!!

  40. jman says:

    Go ahead, divide by zero.

    See if I care.

  41. dnich154 says:

    Is this a fail of a fail?….”All your base are belong to us”?

  42. Soraku101 says:

    the sad part is that the grammar is better than the origonal statment

  43. say says:

    and another shirt on this page i would buy immediately! xD

  44. KittehKitsune says:

    After some rather hilarious experimentation on feeding and refeeding the ever-hungry babelfish some Engrish noms, I ended up with:

    Your foundation belongs in us, completely that is;
    Completely, there is your foundation with our that, it belongs;
    Completely, your foundation our that of that belongs, it is;
    Completely, your foundation to which our that belongs, it is that;
    Completely, our your foundations it belongs, that it is that;
    Completely, our your fundamental that belongs that being, ;
    Completely, a certain thing our your foundations which belong, ;

    And finally, after inserting this last into some random languages:
    One or other inherent we your basis, which belongs entirely, .

    Hahahahaha.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s