Comments on: Come now for a tasty!

By: protection asset

protection asset — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:28:23 +0000

tasty pastry?

By: E

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:39:23 +0000

All for to have SUPERGOOD pleasure of TastyWoW DOUBLEPLUSSGOOD!

By: lolhuman

lolhuman — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:47:20 +0000

nom fokin nom nom.

By: mrgan

mrgan — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:07:43 +0000

ummm.. how do you tell if yur a person or a nonperson?

By: Katie

Katie — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:49:21 +0000

I’m pretty sure it’s ‘unperson’, though.

By: Katie

Katie — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:47:12 +0000

You beat me to it.

By: DI;PH

DI;PH — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:25:05 +0000

YEAH!!! non gramar in post: UNHATED!!!!:)

By: (Obligated)

(Obligated) — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:44:20 +0000

You see…….If the person is not there, he is a nonperson, Therefor you must get a eat (food) for him so when he gets back he will have a tasty!

By: J

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:16:27 +0000

Sadly enough, my only-English speaking former roommate wrote text messages exactly like this.

By: Jodie

Jodie — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:24:04 +0000

I’m going to have to go with this being meant for pregnant women.

By: Happy Pie Man

Happy Pie Man — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:03:54 +0000

You know, I really could go for a tasty right about now. But i am not sharing it with nonperson.

By: JohnB

JohnB — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:06:54 +0000

It seems you CAN say it here, but I don’t advise saying it dare.

By: Droll not Troll

Droll not Troll — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:55:49 +0000

Dare I say it would have served him right for ‘orson around? No, I don’t think I dare.

By: JohnB

JohnB — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:20:42 +0000

Back in my drinking days I had plenty of uneats, as well as some undrinks. I don’t miss them at all! Fighting an undrink could lead to the rather spectacular phenomenon of the Nose Fountain, although no one I was with ever seemed to enjoy the display, and let me tell you, being a bourbon nose fountain is quite unpleasant! But usually I didn’t fight them, and just went to pay homage to the Great God Ralph and kneel before His porcelain throne, chanting the holy mantra, “Bleahhhhh!”

By: JohnB

JohnB — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:14:57 +0000

Should have said Orson WELLES. Of course, War of the Worlds almost ended Welles. If it had, you could say that it was the Wells that ended Welles.

By: Shanaaha

Shanaaha — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:33:38 +0000

…………… YES! I HAVE IT! Wait… wait….I lost it. >.<

By: Four-Eyes

Four-Eyes — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:47:39 +0000

my friends will forever look at me like I’m crazy. But they wouldn’t be my friends if they didn’t know I was crazy. Would they? Are my friends perhaps nonpersons? If they are, how did I not notice? I wanted to get their tasties.

By: Passerby

Passerby — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:48:58 +0000

ROFL!
You win an internet!

By: Passerby

Passerby — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:46:23 +0000

Agreed.
In fact, calling them “nonpersons” is not politically correct.
They prefer to be called “personality challenged”.
…
… er, wait….

By: Un Onymous

Un Onymous — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:20:01 +0000

Is nonperson the same as unperson?

By: Grrr Power

Grrr Power — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:31:46 +0000

It’s a side effect of ignorant English-speaking tourists not being bothered to even learn “Hello” when they go to a foreign country…..
Besides, wouldn’t you if you could?

By: dr_handle

dr_handle — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:58:25 +0000

Non-chicken?

By: Erin

Erin — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:40:19 +0000

Henceforth I will refer to eating all meals as “getting a tasty.”

By: Kae

Kae — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:32:10 +0000

I’ve always wondered what a nonperson tasted like…

By: i'm the chief

i'm the chief — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:45:20 +0000

Why tf do they have to write in english anyway??????

By: zomg

zomg — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:32:41 +0000

This one actually hurt my head.

By: Droll not Troll

Droll not Troll — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:24:09 +0000

Both better than uneats, which sometimes happen later.

By: Droll not Troll

Droll not Troll — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:21:32 +0000

Does that mean you’re going to the dogs? Or are they coming to you………..

By: dr_handle

dr_handle — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:09:57 +0000

AAAAAAAAAARRRRGGGH! Abour turn – heading for Dreadful Pun Hell: quick march!

By: Jojo

Jojo — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:01:24 +0000

I think what they’re saying here is that not a lot of people come to eat there, so you should, to take the place of people who aren’t there.
Or something like that…

By: Duffy

Duffy — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:47:40 +0000

A thoughtful conclusion – most of my family would argue that their non-humans are definitely persons, but in Engrish…could be.

By: Melody

Melody — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:46:00 +0000

I loves me a good tasty. Especially with nonpersons.

By: JohnB

JohnB — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:29:52 +0000

I do know that I much prefer eats to noneats, especially when I eat!

By: JohnB

JohnB — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:27:41 +0000

Seems to me they should sell noneats for nonpersons, but being a person myself, I am probably not qualified to identify the needs of nonpersons.

By: Chris10a

Chris10a — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:26:41 +0000

could this possibly be about eats for persons of the barking persuasion? not so much nonpersons but nonhumans? are we talking dogtreats?

By: JohnB

JohnB — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:47:36 +0000

Are you sure it wasn’t Orson Wells?

By: Stefan

Stefan — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:25:33 +0000

But still, it doesn’t explain, why they sell eats for nonpersons.

By: ObscureWittyReference

ObscureWittyReference — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:02:52 +0000

“Orwell that ends wells.”
Droll not Troll indeed! v.g.

By: Droll not Troll

Droll not Troll — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:31:08 +0000

Thanks. You saved me form having to find my copy of 1984.
Orwell that ends wells.

By: Stefan

Stefan — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:34:44 +0000

*by those authors
Neptundamnit! I better shut up now. v.v

By: Stefan

Stefan — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:33:32 +0000

Aii! That’s right. o.o
That damn school made me read two books at the same time from those authors. And after I spent days comparing them, I keep mixing up the names.

By: palsyboy

palsyboy — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:28:17 +0000

Orwell, not Wells.

By: Zombie

Zombie — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:12:02 +0000

I wounder if the relation between nonperson and person is the same as between dead and undead.

In other words:
It wasn’t a person for a long periode of time till it got “personated” and switched back to be a non-person again with many withdraws like canibalism

Possible solution by the restaurant:
If you get there with e.g. your dog he gets dog brains “for a tasty”

By: Stefan

Stefan — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:57:16 +0000

According to H.G.Well’s “1984″, a nonperson is a person that got erased from history by deleting every single recording, every report, every newspaperarticle and of course by shopping every photo. Nobody is allowed to talke about such a person and soon, the person is not existing anymore and has never existed.
This is a very common method in non-democratic countries like China, the new USA or the old Sowjet Union.

By: dr handle

dr handle — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:45:22 +0000

*a* eat, it specifically says *a* eat. Whatever it is, can it be worse than eating brains?

By: Droll not Troll

Droll not Troll — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:31:27 +0000

If it’s for a tasty you won’t have to.

By: Mick

Mick — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:55:49 +0000

Your mom said that to me too! How cool!

By: griffinlady

griffinlady — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:55:33 +0000

You have to bring more nonperson’s… but the tasty feeds 3 easy.

By: griffinlady

griffinlady — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:53:29 +0000

for an orwell-tasty yes.

By: ObscureWittyReference

ObscureWittyReference — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:49:23 +0000

“Come now for a tasty”? That’s two treats!
A little perturbed by the nonperson reference, though. Seems a bit mean, either having their eat or calling them a nonperson, or both.